Lipofilling or silicone implants: composite correction of lower legs

E.A. Marinicheva

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
MedLaz NJSC

I.G. Marinicheva

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia;
MedLaz NJSC

N.E. Manturova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

SPIN RSCI: 5232-0412
Scopus AuthorID: 55461712100
ORCID: 0000-0003-4281-1947

I.B. Ganshin

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-5766-9416

Lipofilling or silicone implants: composite correction of lower legs

Authors:

E.A. Marinicheva, I.G. Marinicheva, N.E. Manturova, I.B. Ganshin

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2022;(4): 10‑17

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202204110

Downloaded: 38

To cite this article:

Marinicheva EA, Marinicheva IG, Manturova NE, Ganshin IB. Lipofilling or silicone implants: composite correction of lower legs. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2022;(4):10‑17. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202204110

Доказательная гастроэнтерология: pro et contra

Актуальные вопросы педиатрической практики

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To compare silicone implants and lipofilling, as well as their combination regarding stable long-term results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Silicone implants alone were used in 509 patients (mean implant volume 132±26 ml). Maximum soft tissue augmentation by 1.3±0.3 cm was obtained in the middle third of the leg. In the upper third, increment was 0.4±0.4 cm. After 6 months, width of the leg in the middle third additionally increased by 0.3±0.2 cm. Implant contouring requiring correction was observed in 6 (1.2%) patients. Isolated lipofilling of medial surface of the lower leg was performed in 45 patients (mean volume 76±22 ml on each side). Maximum postoperative soft tissue augmentation by 1.2±0.4 cm was observed in the upper third of the lower leg (popliteal depression area). In the middle third, increment was 1.1±0.3 cm. After 6 months, middle third of the leg decreased by 0.7±0.3 cm. At the level of popliteal depression, width decreased by 0.1±0.2 cm. Nine (20%) patients experienced transient focal inflammation at injection sites. Combination of silicone implants and lipofilling was performed in 144 patients (mean implant volume 88±20 ml, fatty tissue volume 38±13 ml on each side). Lipofilling was used mainly in the area of popliteal depression. Soft tissue augmentation at the level of popliteal depression was 1.2±0.5 cm, in the middle third — 1.2±0.3 cm. After 6 months, width of the upper third of the leg decreased by 0.1±0.2 mm. In the middle third, soft tissue augmentation was 0.2±0.1 mm.

CONCLUSION

We recommend a combination of corrective methods to improve the long-term results of lower leg contouring.

Keywords:

lipofilling

implant

lower leg

Authors:

E.A. Marinicheva

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
MedLaz NJSC

I.G. Marinicheva

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia;
MedLaz NJSC

N.E. Manturova

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

SPIN RSCI: 5232-0412
Scopus AuthorID: 55461712100
ORCID: 0000-0003-4281-1947

I.B. Ganshin

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-5766-9416

Received:

18.07.2022

Accepted:

17.08.2022

List of references:

Chugay PN. Calf Augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. 2022;49(2):313-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2021.12.007
Melita D, Innocenti A. Surgical Calf Augmentation Techniques: Personal Experience, Literature Review and Analysis of Complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(4):973-979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01347-z
Pereira LH, Nicaretta B, Sterodimas A. Bilateral calf augmentation for aesthetic purposes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(2):295-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9799-4
Karapetyan GE, Pakhomova RA, Vinnik YuS, Kochetova LV, Markelova NM, Vasilenya ES, Nazaryants YuA, Petrushko SI, Kulikova AB. The remote complications after introduction of poliakrilamidny gel and the way of their correction. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015;5:257. (In Russ.).
Trufanov DI, Kadyrova FZ, Chumpitas PMS. Modern aspects of lipofilling and it’s application features in limb surgery. Annals of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2014;2:68-73. (In Russ.).
Skorobac Asanin V, Sopta J. Lower Leg Augmentation with Fat Grafting, MRI and Histological Examination. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(1):108-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0716-8
Marinicheva IG, Manturova NE, Marinicheva EA. Implant for calf plasty. Annals of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2018;4:43-48. (In Russ.).
Simonacci F, Bertozzi N, Grieco MP, Grignaffini E, Raposio E. Procedure, applications, and outcomes of autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;20:49-60. Published 2017 June 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.06.059
Khouri RK Jr, Khouri RE, Lujan-Hernandez JR, Khouri KR, Lancerotto L, Orgill DP. Diffusion and perfusion: The keys to fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(9):e220. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000183
Fraccalvieri M, Contessa L, Salomone M, Zingarelli EM, Bruschi S. Preoperative color duplex echographical venous mapping before autologous fat graft for calf augmentation: A case report of superficial vein thrombosis and prevalence of intersaphenic anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(2):137-140. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318271007b
Okumus A. Combination of Lipofilling With Liposuction in the Correction of Pseudo Genu Varus Deformity. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(3):94-100. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz305

Close metadata